Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Melnick v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2019cv01550
Defendant:
Caley, (I) Carson, (I) Caley and others
Plaintiff:
Hunter Adam Melnick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Choquette v. Corrections Corporation of America et al
as 1:2016cv01845
Plaintiff:
Dennis Choquette
Defendant:
Corrections Corporation of America , Jordan Melgoza , Jayne Scarff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cary v. Hickenlooper, et al
as 15-1474
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARNOLD A. CARY
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN HICKENLOOPER, Governor, State of Colorado, TOM CLEMENTS, Executive Director, CDOC, REA TIMME, Warden, CTCF and others
Ramirez v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2013cv02236
Plaintiff:
John A. Ramirez
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, Rae Timme, Fredric Gifford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantu v. Executive Director of CDOC et al
as 1:2013cv01500
Plaintiff:
Monte Cantu
Defendant:
Executive Director of CDOC, Rae Timme, Justin McBride and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurston v. Stringari, et al
as 1:2013cv01038
Plaintiff:
Donald S. Thurston
Defendant:
Rodney Achen, Charles J. Schoephoerster, Stringari and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thurston v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2013cv00410
Plaintiff:
Donald S Thurston
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Unknown Parties, Rodney Achen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Scott v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2012cv02097
Plaintiff:
Darrell K. Scott
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Bill Ritter, John W. Suthers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cary v. Hickenlooper et al
as 1:2012cv02072
Plaintiff:
Arnold A. Cary
Defendant:
John Hickenlooper, Bill Ritter, John W. Suthers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wallin v. Achen, et al
as 11-1201
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OLOYEA D. WALLIN
Defendant - Appellee:
RODNEY ACHEN, MASCARENAS, BELL and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
