Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Raymond Roles v. Randy Valley
as 23-35282
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAYMOND A. ROLES
Respondent / Appellee:
RANDY VALLEY, Warden ISCC
Michael Patterson et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 2:2022cv04986
Plaintiff:
Michael Patterson, Samuel Patterson, Kevin Patton and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Rolling Roles, LLC et al v. Red Velvet Entertainment, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv04132
Plaintiff:
Miranda Chen, Rolling Roles LLC and Jie Chen
Petitioner:
FERRA-GILMORE AND JANOVICH PARTNERS DBA RED VELVET ENTERTAINMENT
Defendant:
RED VELVET ENTERTAINMENT, INC., WY, RED VELVET ENTERTAINMENT, INC., CA, CHRISTINA GILMORE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Roles v. Valley
as 1:2022cv00112
Petitioner:
Raymond A Roles
Respondent:
Randy Valley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roling v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2021cv07371
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Roling
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv04435
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Frederick et al v. Monsanto Company
as 3:2021cv03418
Plaintiff:
Bill Hoover, Richard Sivley, Pernecia Hull and others
Defendant:
Monsanto Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sussman et al v. San Diego Police Dept. et al
as 3:2020cv01085
Defendant:
CHP Office Parra, Board of Registered Nursing, Officer Jordan and others
Plaintiff:
Nancy Sussman and Michael Sussman Estate Thereof by and Thru his Special Administer for the Estate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 dp
Raymond Roles v. Jay Christensen, et al
as 20-35071
Defendant / Appellee:
JAY CHRISTENSEN, ISCC Warden and RHONDA OWENS, ISCC, ASM
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAYMOND A. ROLES
Roles v. Christensen et al
as 1:2019cv00292
Defendant:
Rhonda Owens and Jay Christensen
Plaintiff:
Raymond Roles
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
