Cases 1 - 10 of 1,294
Essex et al v. County of Imperial, a Governmental Entity et al
as 3:2024cv00763
Plaintiff:
Elicia Essex and Kristina Essex
Defendant:
County of Imperial, Naphcare, Rosemary Doherty and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Cortez v. Stubbs, et al.
as 24-2714
Plaintiff:
MOISES JOSUE CORTEZ
Defendant:
BRANDON STUBBS, FAC ECF No. 33, JOSE GUZMAN, FAC ECF No. 33, MATTHEW ROMAN and others
(PC) Mack v. Schwarzneggar et al
as 2:2024cv01221
Plaintiff:
Anthony E. Mack
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzneggar, Edmund G. Brown, Gavin Newsom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madison on 5th LLC v. Yesenia Roman et al
as 2:2024cv03457
Plaintiff:
Madison on 5th LLC
Defendant:
Yesenia Roman, Luis Roman and Byron Tecum
Leyva Morales, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2634
Plaintiff:
ALMA EDITH LEYVA MORALES and TIMOTEO MORALES ROMAN
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
(PS) Umberger et al v. City of Folsom et al
as 2:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
George P. Umberger, II, Lisabeth A. King and Savannah R. Bailey
Defendant:
City of Folsom, Joseph Howard, Brian Lockhart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Occidental Fire & Casualty Company of North Carolina v. Seda Arustamyan et al
as 2:2024cv03285
Plaintiff:
Occidential Fire & Casualty Company of North Carolina, a North Carolina Corporation
Defendant:
Seda Arustamyan and Roman Arustamyan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Espinosa v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-2466
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN ESPINOSA
Defendant:
WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden, CHARLES DANIELS, NDOC Director, HAROLD WICKHAM, NDOC Deputy Director FAC #23 and others
Roman Miranda v. Garland
as 24-2285
Petitioner:
JOSEFINA ROMAN MIRANDA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Roman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue
as 24-2220
Petitioner:
LUMINITA ROMAN
Respondent:
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
