Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Gholson v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 2:2012cv00584
Defendant:
Commonwealth of Virginia, Lonnie McDonovan Gholson, Jimmy Gilmore and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie McDonovan Gholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gholson v. Commonwealth Of Virginia et al
as 7:2011cv00371
Defendant:
Sgt. Anthony Adam, George Allen, Ronald Angelone and others
Plaintiff:
Lonnie McDonovan Gholson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lonnie Gholson v. Gene Johnson
as 10-7010
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE MCDONOVAN GHOLSON, etc., all
Defendant - Appellee:
GENE JOHNSON, Head Director of the Virginia Department of Corrections, JOHN JABE, Deputy Director for VDOC, RANDALL MATHENA, Former Arrest Warden at ROSP and others
Salahmand v. Angelone
as 1:2010cv00546
Petitioner:
Mansour Salahmand
Respondent:
Ronald Angelone
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lonnie Gholson v. Commonwealth of Virginia
as 10-6157
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LONNIE MODENENAN GHOLSON
Defendant - Appellee:
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, VIRGINIA ATTORNEY GENERAL, (Mr. Mark Davis; Mr. James Gilmore), COUNTY OF WISE and others
Gholson v. The Commonwealth of Virginia
as 2:2010cv00005
Plaintiff:
Lonnie Modenenan Gholson
Defendant:
The Commonwealth of Virginia, The Virginia Attorney General, The County of Wise and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ford v. Davenport et al
as 2:2007cv00227
Plaintiff:
Robert G. Ford
Defendant:
William W. Davenport, Warren Von Schuch, Kenneth Nickells and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
In re: Baker, Todd v. DC, et al
as 01-5205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Todd Emerson Baker
Defendant - Appellee:
District of Columbia, Kathleen Hawk Sawyer, Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Ronald Angelone, Director, Virginia Department of Corrections and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
