Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Sutton v. Mitchum et al
as 5:2018cv01021
Defendant:
Jimmy Patrick, Dewayne Estes, Billy Mitchum and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Ivey et al
as 5:2018cv00110
Plaintiff:
Ronald . Sutton
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Jefferson Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Bentley et al
as 5:2016cv01812
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutton
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, Jefferson Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Tolbert et al
as 5:2015cv01344
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutton
Defendant:
Tolbert, Darryl Fox, Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Bentley et al
as 5:2015cv00792
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, Jefferson Dunn and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutton
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Bentley et al
as 2:2012cv03570
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutton
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sutton v. Bentley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00643
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutton
Defendant:
Robert Bentley, Luther Strange, Kim Tobias Thomas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Allen et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2011cv00021
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutton
Defendant:
State Dietician for A.D.O.C., Luther Strange and Kim Tobias Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Attorney General for the State of Alabama et al
as 2:2010cv02640
Plaintiff:
Ronald Sutton
Defendant:
Attorney General for the State of Alabama, Richard F. Allen and State Dietician
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Allen et al
as 2:2008cv02012
Petitioner:
Ronald Sutton
Respondent:
Richard Allen and Billy Mitchem
Defendant:
Attorney General of Alabama
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
