Cases 1 - 10 of 17
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31335
Plaintiff:
ROSS ANDERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00216
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ELDON ROSS ANDERSON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Dixon v. Stedman et al
as 1:2022cv03581
Plaintiff:
Terrance Dixon
Defendant:
Emily Stedman, Ross Anderson, Francis LoCoco and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Fraud
Atkins v. Vilt
as 21-2313
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES J. VILT, JR., DREW D'AGOSTINO, KIM FERGUSON and others
Rebekah Atkins v. James Vilt, Jr., et al
as 21-5544
Defendant / Appellee:
KEN SWINK, JOANN L. SPICER, EMILY BRAUN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
REBEKAH A. ATKINS
Atkins v. Vilt et al
as 3:2021cv00295
Defendant:
Elizabeth Parks, April Dowell, Candace Byrd and others
Plaintiff:
Rebekah A. Atkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv11846
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROSS ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERSON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv52760
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
ROSS ANDERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ANDERSON v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2019cv15737
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC, TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC and others
Plaintiff:
ROSS ANDERSON
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (No. II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Anderson v. United States of America
as 1:2019cv00129
Plaintiff:
Ross Anderson
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
