Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Morales v. Ross Dress For Less Inc
as 8:2023cv01965
Plaintiff:
Sylvanna Morales
Defendant:
Ross Dress For Less Inc
Not Classified By Court:
Charles N. Castagna
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Roman v. Ross Dress for Less Inc.
as 6:2023cv01466
Plaintiff:
Diana C. Roman
Defendant:
Ross Dress for Less Inc. doing business as DD's Discounts
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Job Discrimination (Race)
Mok v. Ross Dress for Less Incorporated
as 2:2022cv01257
Plaintiff:
Christian Mok
Defendant:
Ross Dress for Less Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Vesci v. Ross Dress for Less, Inc.
as 8:2021cv02948
Plaintiff:
Michael Vesci
Defendant:
Ross Dress for Less, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
FERRO v. ROSS DRESS FOR LESS, INC.
as 1:2021cv20235
Defendant:
ROSS DRESS FOR LESS, INC.
Plaintiff:
BRUNO FERRO
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Bravo v. Ross Dress for Less Inc.
as 6:2018cv02210
Plaintiff:
Deborah Bravo
Defendant:
Ross Dress for Less Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Briceno et al v. USM Incorporated et al
as 4:2016cv00618
Plaintiff:
Delia Briceno , Rubi Briceno , Magdalena Campos and others
Defendant:
USM Incorporated, Ross Dress for Less Incorporated, Pier 1 Imports Incorporated and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Castellanos v. Ross Dress For Less, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv24463
Plaintiff:
Miriam Castellanos
Defendant:
Ross Dress For Less, Inc. and Michael O'Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Rangel-Lopez v. Ross Dress For Less, Inc.
as 3:2013cv01946
Plaintiff:
Alejandra Rangel-Lopez
Defendant:
Ross Dress For Less, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Rosa Cortez et al v. Ross Dress For Less Inc et al
as 5:2013cv01298
Plaintiff:
Rosa Cortez and Diana Robles
Defendant:
Does and Ross Dress For Less Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
