Cases 41 - 50 of 208
Owens v. Mitchell et al
as 1:2021cv00089
Plaintiff:
Berques Rashad Owens
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree and Aaron Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quint Evans v. Richard Roundtree, et al
as 21-11652
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLES B. WEBSTER DETENTION CENTER, WARDEN and RICHARD ROUNDTREE
Plaintiff / Appellant:
QUINT L. EVANS
USA v. Michael Roundtree, Jr.
as 21-11964
Defendant / Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY ROUNDTREE, JR.
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Roundtree v. United States of America
as 8:2021cv00955
Plaintiff:
Ashanti Roundtree
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
JONES et al v. WILLISTON POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 1:2021cv00070
Defendant:
MATTHEW FORTNEY, JOHN SALMEIER, MARQUIS WRIGHT and others
Plaintiff:
CAROL JONES and SHERVONTAY ROUNDTREE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUNDTREE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv19162
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
TERRANCE ROUNDTREE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roundtree v. Pfizer, Inc. et al
as 9:2021cv80706
Defendant:
Sanofi US Servces Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kathy Roundtree
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROUNDTREE v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv09296
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
JAMAICA ROUNDTREE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Scott v. Richmond County et al
as 1:2020cv00159
Defendant:
Sheriff Richard Roundtree, Richmond County, Does 1 - 5 and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Scott
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Evans v. Roundtree et al
as 1:2020cv00153
Defendant:
Warden Charles Samuels, Charles B. Webster Detention Center and Sheriff Richard Roundtree
Plaintiff:
Quint L. Evans
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
