Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 1 - 10 of 15
ROUNDTREE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv03205
Petitioner: JEFFREY ROUNDTREE
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ROUNDTREE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2020cv00378
Petitioner: JEFFREY ROUNDTREE
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Gary v. Elkhart Indiana City of et al
as 3:2018cv00957
Defendant: Elkhart Police Chief Edward Windbigler, Police Officer Robert Roundtree, City of Elkhart and others
Undetermined: Administrator Lamecka Gary
Estate Plaintiff: Lameka Gary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARY v. City of Elkhart et al
as 3:2018cv00954
Defendant: Leonard Dolshenko, Mayor City of Elkhart, Edward Windbigler and others
Undetermined: Administratrix LAMEKA GARY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
GARY v. Elkhart Indiana The City of et al
as 3:2018cv00951
Defendant: Leonard Dolshenko, Edward Windbigler, Elkhart Indiana The City of and others
Plaintiff: Administratrix LAMEKA GARY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROUNDTREE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv02238
Petitioner: JEFFREY ROUNDTREE
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
ROUNDTREE v. WERLICH
as 1:2018cv00495
Petitioner: JEFFREY ROUNDTREE
Respondent: TOM WERLICH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03114
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
ROUNDTREE v. USA
as 1:2017cv02223
Petitioner: JEFFERY ROUNDTREE
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
ROUNDTREE v. USA
as 1:2016cv01663
Petitioner: JEFFREY ROUNDTREE
Respondent: UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?