Cases 1 - 10 of 26
ARCURI et al v. COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY et al
as 2:2020cv05408
Defendant:
SEAN GORMAN, TIARE NIMMO-LEE, YOUNGSHIL DUNBAR and others
Plaintiff:
PHILIP J ARCURI and MELANIE ARCURI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SCOTT v. WETZEL et al
as 3:2020cv00173
Plaintiff:
HARVEY SCOTT SCOTT and HARVEY SCOTT, JR.
Defendant:
SHAEFER, HAY, GERBER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv00903
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
SPENCER v. DOE et al
as 3:2018cv00251
Defendant:
MRS. TURNER, JOHN DOE, DABBS and others
Plaintiff:
TYLER SPENCER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ROUNDTREE v. DELBALSO et al
as 5:2018cv03082
Respondent:
THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA, THERESA DELBALSO and THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF LEHIGH COUNTY
Petitioner:
DONNIEL ROUNDTREE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
SMITH et al v. AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC. et al
as 2:2016cv00156
Defendant:
AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC, AMERICAN AIRLINES, INC., US AIRWAYS, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
SMITH, DAVID SMITH, ANDRE FIELDS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00945
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
ROUNDTREE v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
as 2:2014cv03593
Plaintiff:
SHAYLA ROUNDTREE
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02152
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
ALAIMALO et al v. MCKESSON CORPORATION et al
as 2:2013cv05870
Plaintiff:
ROSALYNN ALAIMALO , LILIAN GUTIERREZ , JOHN KRAMARZ and others
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORPORATION and SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
