Cases 1 - 10 of 28
Avery v. U.S. Xpress, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00204
Plaintiff:
Terry Avery
Defendant:
U.S. Xpress, Inc., Mountain Lake Risk Retention Group, Inc. and Marquania Rowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Waters v. City of South Fulton, Georgia et al
as 1:2023cv04396
Plaintiff:
Thomas N. Waters, Jr.
Defendant:
City of South Fulton, Georgia, Catherine Foster-Rowell, Carmalitha Gumbs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Alonsa et al v. Wilcher
as 4:2022cv00214
Plaintiff:
Humberto Mendez Alonsa, Jose Torres Gomez, James Blige and others
Defendant:
Sheriff John T. Wilcher
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv04642
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Rowell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01949
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Michele Rowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02153
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hall v. Tanner et al
as 5:2019cv00066
Defendant:
Jacqueline Bunn, Ofc. John Spears, Terry Barnard and others
Plaintiff:
Loren D. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hall v. Adams
as 5:2019cv00030
Respondent:
Ofc. John Spears, Alexander Markowich, Tasha Roberts and others
Petitioner:
Loren D. Hall, Sr
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
NESBITT v. LONG et al
as 5:2019cv00067
Defendant:
DOCTOR PETER WROBEL, DOCTOR ROWELL NANCY, NURSE JANE DOES and others
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL JAMES NESBITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rowell v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv05758
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Sylvia Rowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
