Cases 1 - 10 of 787
Toussiant v. O' Malley
as 3:2024cv00719
Plaintiff:
Rudy Toussiant
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 rs Review of HHS Decision (RSI)
Sepulveda v. T-Mobile USA Inc
as 2:2024cv00519
Plaintiff:
Rudy Sepulveda
Defendant:
T-Mobile USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
(PC) Tellez v. Hixon et al
as 1:2024cv00402
Plaintiff:
Rudy Tellez
Defendant:
K. Hixon, E. Cisneros and M. Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. 23andMe, Inc.
as 3:2024cv01418
Plaintiff:
Rudy K. Thompson
Defendant:
23andMe, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Mancia-Espinosa v. Garland
as 24-1275
Petitioner:
RUDY ALEXANDER MANCIA-ESPINOSA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ou-Young v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024mc80045
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff's Office, Gregory J. Ahern, Alameda County Santa Rita Jail and others
United States of America v. Gasparyan
as 24-968
Defendant:
EDUARD GASPARYAN, Rudy Pineda and Papin Galstyan
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Janet Farzan v. Bruce McMahon et al
as 2:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Ms. Janet Farzan
Defendant:
Bruce McMahon, Kimberly R. McMahon, Kimberly A. Rudy Family Trust and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Destiny Patino et al v. United Parcel Service Inc. et al
as 8:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Destiny Patino and Kelvin Melo
Defendant:
United Parcel Service, Inc., Rudy Gonzalez, United Parcel Service Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Ou-Young v. Alameda County Sheriff's Office, et al
as 3:2023cv06597
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao Paul Ou-Young
Defendant:
Alameda County Sheriff's Office, Merrick B. Garland, Gregory J. Ahern and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
