Cases 1 - 10 of 93
JOHNSON v. FACEBOOK et al
as 2:2023cv03413
Plaintiff:
ROBERT W. JOHNSON
Defendant:
FACEBOOK, META, RUDY GIULIANI and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv01301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rudy Avila v. Philips Respironics et al
as 2:2023cv01373
Plaintiff:
Rudy Avila
Defendant:
PHILIPS RESPIRONICS, RESPIRONICS, INC. and DOES 1-50, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Mendoza v. USA
as 3:2023cv00681
Petitioner:
Rudy Mendoza
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
WATKINS v. FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP et al
as 2:2023cv00021
Plaintiff:
BRIAN WATKINS, JR.
Defendant:
FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP, FRANKLIN TOWNSHIP POLICE DEPARTMENT, RUDY HAWKINS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01677
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2021cv02058
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
RUDY et al v. AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. et al
as 3:2020cv00056
Plaintiff:
LISA CHRISTINE RUDY and WILLIAM TROY RUDY
Defendant:
AMERICAN MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC. and CALDERA MEDICAL, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
TAVERAS v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2019cv06163
Defendant:
OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES, THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-3
Plaintiff:
RUDY TAVERAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
