Cases 21 - 30 of 51
Martinez-Crespo v. ELA et al
as 3:2015cv03013
Plaintiff:
Juan C. Martinez-Crespo
Defendant:
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, Departamento de Justicia, Policia De Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ruiz-Colon v. Miranda-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2015cv01754
Defendant:
Cesar R. Miranda-Rodriguez, Jose B. Capo-Rivera, Department of Justice - Commonwealth of P.R. and others
Plaintiff:
Nelson Ruiz-Colon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Neris-Ruiz v. US
as 14-2009
Petitioner - Appellant:
ANGEL LUIS NERIS-RUIZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv01153
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Cancel-Ruiz v. US
as 13-1872
Petitioner - Appellant:
TEOBALDO CANCEL-RUIZ
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Ruiz-Diaz v. USA
as 3:2012cv01808
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan Ruiz-Diaz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ruiz v. USA - DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE - ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 3:2011cv30218
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Bernie Ruiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Ruiz-Rodriguez v. Miranda-Rodriguez et al
as 3:2011cv01657
Plaintiff:
Arquelio Ruiz-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Jose Miranda-Rodriguez and Guillermo Somoza-Colombani
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Garcia v. Rama Judicial de Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2011cv01275
Plaintiff:
Jorge Javier Garcia
Defendant:
Rama Judicial de Puerto Rico, Departamento de Justicia de Puerto Rico, Administracion de Correccion de Puerto Rico and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fortunato-Irizarry v. Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico et al
as 3:2011cv01266
Plaintiff:
Victor Fortunato-Irizarry
Defendant:
Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico, Edwar Rodriguez-Gonzalez, Wilfredo Marrero-Aponte and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
