Cases 21 - 30 of 125
Akhmed Gadzhievich v. Herman Gref
as 22-2671
Plaintiff:
ABC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Akhmed Gadzhievich Bilalov, an individual
Defendant / Appellee:
Herman Gref, Sberbank CIB USA, Inc. and Sberbank of Russia PJSC
Defendant:
DEF, Kirill Androsov and Does 1-100
Jeffery Gibson v. Greenway, et al
as 22-13447
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFERY GIBSON
Defendant / Appellee:
U.S. JUDGE GREENWAY, U.S. JUDGE KRAUSE, U.S. JUDGE BIBES and others
Johnson v. Tunecore
as 22-2006
Petitioner:
Robert W. Johnson
Respondent:
Tunecore, iTunes, Apple Music and others
Johnson v. Tunecore et al
as 1:2022cv06460
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
Tunecore, iTunes, Apple Music and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Gibson v. Greenway et al
as 1:2022cv02649
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gibson
Defendant:
U.S. Judge Greenway, U.S. Judge Krause, U.S. Judge Bibes and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Jeffrey Gibson v. Citizen Bank, et al
as 22-1771
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JEFFREY GIBSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CITIZEN BANK, FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and RUSSIA GRU
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv00675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv03216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
James Malarik, et al v. Beaver County Jail Administrat, et al
as 21-3175
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES M. MALARIK
Plaintiff / Appellee:
DAVID LYONS, SR. and ERNEST THORTON
Defendant / Appellee:
BEAVER COUNTY JAIL ADMINISTRATION, STEVE COOLEY, RUDOLPH GUILAY and others
Subway International B.V. v. Subway Russia Franchising Company, LLC
as 1:2021cv07362
Petitioner:
Subway International B.V.
Respondent:
Subway Russia Franchising Company, LLC
Cause Of Action: 9 U.S.C. § 9
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
