Cases 21 - 30 of 68
Baxter et al v. Pipe Fitters' Local 597 Welfare and Retirement Fund
as 1:2022cv01637
Plaintiff:
Michael Baxter and Ryder Baxter
Defendant:
Pipe Fitters' Local 597 Welfare and Retirement Fund, Hi-Tide Campground, LLC, Hi-Tide Recreation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01171
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Ryder v. Cook County Department of Public Health
as 1:2022cv00626
Plaintiff:
E. Thomas Ryder
Defendant:
Cook County Department of Public Health and Rachel Rubin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ryder v. Norfolk Southern Railway Company
as 3:2021cv03228
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Ryder
Defendant:
Norfolk Southern Railway Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company v. JDM Expedite, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01274
Plaintiff:
Acuity, A Mutual Insurance Company
Defendant:
Arch Insurance Company, Craig Robert Fogleman, Auduariaus Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Horn v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv06231
Defendant:
Comcast Corporation, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. and Comcast of Illinois XI, LLC
Plaintiff:
Tiny Horn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ryder v. Hyles et al
as 1:2020cv01153
Plaintiff:
Joy Ryder
Defendant:
David Hyles, First Baptist Church of Hammond, Indiana, INC. and Hyles- Anderson College, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Castillo v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv00467
Defendant:
Sayram Corp., Jasur Khultaev, Ryder Truck Rental, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kirsy Castillo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv08461
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv01356
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
