Cases 1 - 10 of 488
Ernest v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Rachel Ernest
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Levengood v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv00396
Plaintiff:
Rachel Teresa Levengood
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv00466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
KOZLOFF v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al
as 1:2024cv00027
Petitioner:
RACHEL KOZLOFF
Respondent:
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and WARDEN OF SCI MUNCY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SKOLNICK v. EVOLUTION AB (publ) et al
as 2:2024cv00326
Plaintiff:
RACHEL SKOLNICK
Defendant:
EVOLUTION AB (publ), Marin Carleslund, Jacob Kaplan and others
G.A. v. SNEAD et al
as 2:2024cv00141
Plaintiff:
G.A.
Defendant:
MEG SNEAD, DR. VAL ARKOOSH, RACHEL LEWIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
HUGHES v. NOVO NORDISK A/S et al
as 2:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
RACHEL HUGHES
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
