Cases 1 - 10 of 28
George v. Dodd et al
as 3:2024cv00320
Plaintiff:
Vincent M George, Jr.
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd, William Loy, Robert Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manley v. Babich et al
as 3:2023cv03982
Plaintiff:
Douglas L. Manley
Defendant:
Dr Babich, Rachell Dodd, Mr. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dominguez v. Hughes et al
as 1:2023cv16285
Plaintiff:
Luis Dominguez
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Wexford Health Sources, Dr. David Poor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mitchell v. Dodd et al
as 3:2023cv03255
Plaintiff:
Ephraim Mitchell
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd, Williams Lay and C/O Warfel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Manley v. Conn et al
as 3:2023cv03146
Plaintiff:
Douglas L. Manley
Defendant:
Daniel Conn, Wexford Health Sources Inc., Jay Robert Pritzker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Frakes v. Dodd et al
as 3:2023cv02963
Plaintiff:
William L Frankes and William L Frakes
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd, Wexford Medical Group, Sargent Warren and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berry v. Claude et al
as 3:2023cv02451
Plaintiff:
Teon Berry
Defendant:
Dr Claude, Charles Truitt, Rachel Dodd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Baker v. Dodd
as 3:2023cv02132
Petitioner:
Salih Baker
Respondent:
Rachel Dodd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perkins v. Dodd et al
as 3:2023cv01467
Plaintiff:
Antonio R Perkins
Defendant:
Rachel Dodd and W Loy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blazer v. Martin et al
as 3:2023cv01343
Plaintiff:
Adam Blazer
Defendant:
P. Martin, Rachel Dodd, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
