Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Vargas v. Federal Express Corporation
as 1:2026cv04542
Plaintiff:
Rachele Vargas
Defendant:
Federal Express Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Newton v. General Motors LLC
as 4:2026cv07805
Plaintiff:
Rachel Mitchell Newton
Defendant:
General Motors LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Sutton v. Allied Trust Insurance Company
as 2:2026cv02075
Plaintiff:
Rachel Sutton
Defendant:
Allied Trust Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Property Damage
Brown v. Steinhardt et al
as 1:2026cv05730
Plaintiff:
Robin Brown
Defendant:
Susan Steinhardt, Village of Southampton, Board of Trustees of the Village of Southampton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ritchie et al v. Luminis Health, Inc.
as 1:2026cv03663
Plaintiff:
Angela Ritchie and Rachel Rogers
Defendant:
Luminis Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
VDARE Foundation, Inc. v. James
as 26-2575
Plaintiff:
VDARE FOUNDATION, INC.
Defendant:
LETITIA JAMES, RICHARD SAWYER, YAEL FUCHS and others
Uhuru v. Gin, et al.
as 26-6019
Plaintiff:
KOHEN DIALLO E. UHURU
Defendant:
JASMIN GIN, Community Resource Manager, GENA JONES, CDCR Director, DAO VANG, Acting Warden at CHCF and others
Van v. Carlson et al
as 1:2026cv01676
Plaintiff:
Rachel E Van
Defendant:
Officer Carlson and Officer Lannoye
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Verdeyen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2026cv01293
Plaintiff:
Rachel Verdeyen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSAOGC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Macon et al v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2026cv02519
Plaintiff:
Rachel Macon and Danielle Ross
Defendant:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections, Kameron Christopher Harvanek, Brittany Ann Chastang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
