Cases 31 - 40 of 174
Jones v. U.S. Senate Payroll Dept. et al
as 1:2017cv07271
Petitioner:
Rafael Arden Jones
Respondent:
U.S. Senate Payroll Dept., Houst of Representative Payroll Dept., Ivan Snicler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Snider et al
as 1:2017cv06438
Plaintiff:
Rafael A. Jones
Defendant:
Ivan Snider and James Butler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. Federal Elections Commission et al
as 1:2016cv05007
Plaintiff:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Federal Elections Commission, United States Senate, Sam Sloan and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones et al v. Stewart et al
as 1:2016cv02375
Plaintiff:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr., Blackout Entertainment and DoeBoy Entertainment
Defendant:
Sakir Stewart, Island Def Jam South, Island Def-Jam Universal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Christ Temple Church et al
as 1:2016cv02202
Plaintiff:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Christ Temple Church, Molly McKracken, Marinella Orinella and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Doe et al
as 1:2016cv02201
Plaintiff:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Jane Doe, John Doe and Lenox Ave Cafe & Coffee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Nazianzeao et al
as 1:2016cv00640
Plaintiff:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Lucy Nazianzeao, John Doe or Jane Doe, Bryan Trevino and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jones v. State of New York et al
as 1:2016cv00556
Plaintiff:
Rafael Arden Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
State of New York, New York State Police Department, Bellevue Hospital and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rafael Jones, Sr. v. Jeff Norman
as 16-1102
Petitioner - Appellant:
Rafael A. Jones, Sr.
Respondent - Appellee:
Jeff Norman
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv09834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
