Cases 1 - 10 of 80
Jones v. United States of America
as 4:2015cv00989
Petitioner:
Rafael A. Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Lombardi
as 4:2015cv00351
Petitioner:
Rafael A. Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
George A. Lombardi
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Clear Channel Broadcasting Company et al
as 4:2014cv01120
Plaintiff:
Rafael A. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Clear Channel Broadcasting Company and Stacy Static
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Sachse
as 4:2014cv00763
Petitioner:
Rafael A. Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
Jennifer Sachse
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. United States of America
as 4:2014cv00304
Petitioner:
Rafael A. Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Obama
as 4:2013cv01420
Petitioner:
Rafael A. Jones, Sr.
Respondent:
Barack Hussein Obama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jones v. Missouri Board of Probation and Parole et al
as 4:2013cv01409
Plaintiff:
Rafael A. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Missouri Board of Probation and Parole, Missouri Department of Corrections and St. Louis Community Release Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. United States of America et al
as 4:2013cv01019
Plaintiff:
Rafael A. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
United States of America, Lewis M. Blanton and United States District Court, Southeast Division
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Jones v. United States District Courts of Appeal for the Eighth Circuit of St. Louis
as 4:2013cv01020
Plaintiff:
Rafael A. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
United States District Courts of Appeal for the Eighth Circuit of St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Wadley et al
as 2:2013cv04128
Plaintiff:
Rafael A. Jones, Sr.
Defendant:
Unknown Wadley and Unknown Falter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
