Cases 1 - 10 of 3,376
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00527
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 651 Occupational Safety/Health
Thomas v. Director TDCJ
as 1:2024cv00216
Petitioner:
Sugar Ray Thomas
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carlile v. Safeco Insurance Company of America et al
as 2:2024cv00423
Plaintiff:
David C Carlile
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America, Michael Ray Moore and American Economy Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Moad et al v. Norton Transport, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
David Moad and Monika Moad
Defendant:
Norton Transport, Inc. and Justin Ray Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Walker v. Thompson et al
as 3:2024cv01311
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Walker
Defendant:
Lowell Thompson, Will Thompson, Andrew Wolf and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Powell v. Hall et al
as 6:2024cv00290
Plaintiff:
Reggie Montel Powell
Defendant:
Billy Ray Hall, Bell County Law Enforcement Center and Officer S. Blue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Garcia v. Randall County Jail et al
as 2:2024cv00117
Plaintiff:
Daniel Ray Garcia
Defendant:
Randall County Jail, Christopher Forbis, Randall Co Medical Service and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Mosley v. UFN
as 9:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Marion Ray Mosley
Defendant:
ULN UFN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
