Cases 1 - 10 of 10
RAKERS v. ROTHFUS
as 5:2023cv00784
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY RAKERS
Defendant:
KATHLEEN ROTHFUS and KATHLEEN H. ROTHFUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
RAKERS v. Rothfus
as 2:2023cv00783
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY RAKERS
Defendant:
Kathleen Rothfus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
RAKERS v. YODER'S RESTAURANT, INC.
as 5:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY RAKERS
Defendant:
YODER'S RESTAURANT, INC. doing business as "AMERICAN BAR AND GRILL"
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
RAKERS v. YODER'S RESTAURANT, INC.
as 2:2023cv00666
Plaintiff:
BRITTANY RAKERS
Defendant:
YODER'S RESTAURANT, INC. doing business as "AMERICAN BAR AND GRILL"
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
RAKER v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2015cv04457
Plaintiff:
SHERRI LYNN RAKER
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fares v. Lankau et al
as 1:2012cv01381
Plaintiff:
Jim Fares
Defendant:
Peter Lankau , Douglas Karp , Eric Liebler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Fiduciary Duty
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2012cv00119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
GORALEWSKI v. RAKER et al
as 1:2011cv01794
Petitioner:
Jacob Goralewski
Respondent:
Calvin Raker, The District Attorney of the County of Schuykill and The Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
GORALEWSKI v. RAKER et al
as 2:2011cv05179
Petitioner:
JACOB GORALEWSKI
Respondent:
CALVIN RAKER, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF SCHUYKILL and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
RAKER v. BAR BQ PIT, INC
as 5:2010cv02885
Plaintiff:
JESSICA LYN RAKER
Defendant:
BAR BQ PIT, INC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
