Cases 1 - 10 of 98
Tidmore v. Georgia Dept of Corrections et al
as 1:2017cv00883
Petitioner:
Brian K. Tidmore
Respondent:
Georgia Dept of Corrections, Wheeler Correctional Facility, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tidmore v. Georgia Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv03143
Plaintiff:
Brian Tidmore
Defendant:
Georgia Dept. of Corrections, Corrections Corporation of America, Wheeler Corrections Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tidmore v. Georgia Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv02806
Plaintiff:
Brian Tidmore
Defendant:
Georgia Dept. of Corrections, Corrections Corporation of America, Wheeler Corrections Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mack Lott v. Ralph Kemp, et al
as 15-7087
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mack Henry Lott
Defendant / Appellee:
Ralph Kemp, Warden, Jerry Sikes, Investigator, Ron Cole, Unit Manager and others
Mack Lott v. Ralph Kemp, et al
as 15-7087
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Mack Henry Lott
Defendant - Appellee:
Ralph Kemp, Warden, Jerry Sikes, Investigator, Ron Cole, Unit Manager and others
Cassell v. Kemp et al
as 6:2015cv00088
Plaintiff:
Solomon Cassell
Defendant:
Ralph Kemp, Bruce Chapman, Rufus Logan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sims v. Kemp
as 1:2015cv02145
Petitioner:
Thomas Lincoln Sims
Respondent:
Ralph Kemp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
LOTT v. KEMP et al
as 1:2015mc00466
Plaintiff:
HENRY LOTT
Defendant:
RALPH KEMP, JERRY SIKES, RON COLE and others
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Lott v. Willis of Tennesee Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00117
Plaintiff:
Mack Henry Lott
Defendant:
Willis of Tennesee Inc., Ralph Kemp, Ron Cold and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Aiken v. Kemp et al
as 3:2014cv00111
Plaintiff:
Jay Aiken
Defendant:
Ralph Kemp, Correction Corporation of America and Brian Owens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
