Cases 1 - 10 of 40
Red Feather Golf and Social Club, LLC v. Sod Solutions, Inc.
as 5:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Red Feather Golf and Social Club, LLC and Brad Ralston
Defendant:
Sod Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Ralston Outdoor Advertising Ltd v. City of Dallas et al
as 3:2022cv01433
Plaintiff:
Ralston Outdoor Advertising Ltd
Defendant:
City of Dallas and Dallas Board of Adjustment
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Derrick Ralston Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2021cv00684
Plaintiff:
Derrick Ralston Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Burns v. Polk et al
as 4:2021cv00602
Respondent:
Michael N. Bates, Balden B Polk, Ralston D Marshall and others
Petitioner:
James Edward Burns
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BURNS v. POLK et al
as 5:2021cv00045
Respondent:
Michael N. Bates, Balden B Polk and Ralston D Marshall
Petitioner:
JAMES EDWARD BURNS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Perez v. Martin et al
as 5:2020cv00102
Defendant:
Jamie Martin, Ralston D Marshall, Jonathan W. Huff and others
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Martin et al
as 1:2020cv00593
Plaintiff:
Roberto Perez
Defendant:
Jamie Martin, Catherine Ebunc, Wanda Numfor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohannan v. Redic et al
as 6:2020cv00293
Defendant:
Unknown Garrett, Vickie Barrow, Timothy C Jones and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Bohannan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bohannan v. Polk, et al
as 5:2020cv00098
Defendant:
Michael Bates, Balden Polk and Ralston Marshall
Plaintiff:
Michael Bohannan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Polk et al
as 5:2020cv00087
Plaintiff:
Steven Damien Young
Defendant:
Michael Bates, Ralston D Marshall and Balden O Polk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
