Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv08883
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Oyo Hotels Inc v. Ram Krishna LLC
as 3:2023cv01811
Plaintiff:
Oyo Hotels Inc
Defendant:
Ram Krishna LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1330 Breach of Contract
State of Arizona, et al v. USDC-AZT
as 21-71312
Not Classified By Court:
In re: STATE OF ARIZONA, ANDY TOBIN, PAUL SHANNON and others
Petitioner:
STATE OF ARIZONA
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA, TUCSON
Byanjankar et al v. US Bangla Airlines Limited
as 1:2020cv01316
Plaintiff:
Kaniska Budhathoki, Piyush Baral, Estate of Shweta Thapa and others
Defendant:
US Bangla Airlines Limited
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00035
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Bohara v. Sessions
as 17-1005
Petitioner:
Ram Krishna Bohara
Respondent:
Jefferson B. Sessions III, United States Attorney General
In Re: IPO Securities Lit., et al v. , et al
as 1:2021mc00092
Plaintiff:
John Gulizia, Daniel Kucera, Paterson Family Trust and others
Petitioner:
Dale Scott, Robert E. Wallin, Shailesh Pathak and others
Defendant:
WebMethods, Inc., Lehman Brothers, Zhou Shun Ao and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Charles W. Wingfield, III and James W. Giddens
Lead Plaintiff:
Forrest England and Estelle Cohen
Appellant:
James J Hayes, Robert J Federmann, Dolly Bhatt and others
Not Classified By Court:
Richard Paul Warren, Ronald Ady, James J. Mary and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Diane C. Collins, James E. Collins, Frederick B. Henderson and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Wachovia Capital Markets, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78 m(a) Securities Exchange Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
