Cases 31 - 40 of 15,643
Maney, et al. v. State of Oregon, et al.
as 24-2715
Plaintiff:
PAUL MANEY, GARY CLIFT, THERON HALL and others
Defendant:
STATE OF OREGON, COLETTE PETERS, HEIDI STEWARD, ACTING DIRECTOR and others
Santamaria-Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2700
Petitioner:
MARTA ALICIA SANTAMARIA-RAMIREZ and ERICK ADOLFO LEIVA-SANTAMARIA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Clemons v. McSlone (#118) et al
as 6:2024cv06061
Plaintiff:
Ovell Daniel Clemons, Jr.
Defendant:
Officer McSlone (#118), Officer Ramirez (#171), Officer Gibson (#105) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramirez v. Family Dollar Stores of Texas, LLC et al
as 3:2024cv00143
Plaintiff:
Jesus Acosta Ramirez
Defendant:
Family Dollar Stores of Texas, LLC, Family Dollar and Family Dollar Stores of Texas, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Ramirez-Salas De Martinez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2671
Petitioner:
DENIA MERCI RAMIREZ-SALAS DE MARTINEZ, YASMIN CAMILA MARTINEZ-RAMIREZ and LEANDRO OMAR RAMIREZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024oe01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01987
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Lopez Ramirez, et al. v. Garland
as 24-2609
Petitioner:
MARIA GUADALUPE LOPEZ RAMIREZ, IAN EMMANUEL CERRITOS LOPEZ and CHRISTOPHER ALONSO CERRITOS LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Ramirez Rivera, et al. v. Miller, et al.
as 24-2587
Plaintiff:
ELIA RAMIREZ RIVERA and ROBERTO CASIANO CHINO
Defendant:
LOREN K. MILLER, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, UR M. JADDOU and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
