Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Ramiro Reyes Gomez v. William Barr
as 20-72853
Petitioner:
RAMIRO REYES GOMEZ
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney General
Ramiro Reyes, et al v. Wentland, et al
as 17-15159
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAMIRO REYES and STELLA REYES
Defendant - Appellee:
WENTLAND, Stockton Police Officer and WIGHT, Stockton Police Officer
Reyes v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv00156
Defendant:
Acting Commissioner Carolyn W. Colvin
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Reyes
Notice Only Party:
Social Security Liaison and U.S. Attorney Liaison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Campos v. Saldivena of Broward Corporation et al
as 0:2016cv61079
Plaintiff:
Jose Ramiro Reyes Campos
Defendant:
Saldivena of Broward Corporation, Federico Yanez and Villeda Concrete Finish, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reyes et al v. Osborne et al
as 2:2015at00514
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Reyes and Stella Reyes
Defendant:
Joseph Osborne, William Schoenleber, Stockton Police Officer Wentland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reyes et al v. Osborne et al
as 2:2015cv00932
Plaintiff:
Ramiro Reyes and Stella Reyes
Defendant:
Joseph Osborne, William Schoenleber, Wentland and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramiro Reyes-Mendez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 14-3432
Petitioner:
RAMIRO REYES-MENDEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00942
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Ramiro Reyes-Mendez v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 13-2289
Petitioner:
RAMIRO REYES-MENDEZ
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., Attorney General of the United States
USA v. Ramiro Reyes-Sanchez
as 12-30734
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAMIRO REYES-SANCHEZ, also known as Ramiro Sanchez-Sanchez, also known as Reyes Ramiro Sanchez, also known as Ovidio Mejilla-Escorcia, also known as Daniel Pena
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
