Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ramone Wright v. Federal Correctional Complex-Coleman, Florida, et al
as 23-12503
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAMONE WRIGHT
Defendant / Appellee:
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL COMPLEX-COLEMAN, FLORIDA, COLEMAN MEDICAL DEPARTMENT, G. LEE, Unit Manager A2 and others
Wright v. Federal Correctional Complex - Coleman et al
as 5:2023cv00357
Plaintiff:
Ramone Wright
Defendant:
Federal Correctional Complex - Coleman, Coleman Medical Department, G. Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wright v. Warden of Bennettsville FCI
as 5:2023cv01934
Petitioner:
Ramone Wright
Respondent:
United States and Warden of Bennettsville FCI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wright v. Warden FCI Bennettsville
as 5:2023cv00330
Petitioner:
Ramone Wright
Respondent:
Warden FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wright v. Warden FCI Bennettsville
as 5:2023cv00221
Petitioner:
Ramone Wright
Respondent:
Warden FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wright v. Watson
as 2:2022cv04042
Plaintiff:
Ramone Wright
Defendant:
Michael H Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Warden of FCI Bennettsville
as 5:2022cv02993
Petitioner:
Ramone Wright
Respondent:
Bares and Warden of FCI Bennettsville
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6360
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-6358
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Wright v. Henry
as 1:2021cv02410
Petitioner:
Ramone Wright
Respondent:
Warden Michelle Henry
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
