Cases 1 - 10 of 201
Aguilar #118162 v. Ramos et al
as 2:2024cv00592
Plaintiff:
Rodrigo Benito Aguilar
Defendant:
Albert Ramos and Gaughan Daniel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caraffa #350727 v. Leon et al
as 4:2024cv00043
Plaintiff:
Alfred Erika Caraffa and Unknown Parties
Defendant:
Unknown Leon, Unknown Ramos, M Moyer and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Medina #268030 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Dominic Alfred Medina
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, Unknown Girke, Unknown Ramos and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dennison #143931 v. Thornell et al
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Andre Dennison
Defendant:
Ryan Thornell, David Shinn, J Cuevas and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos-Munoz #301088 v. Unknown Party
as 2:2023cv02621
Plaintiff:
Christian Joseph Ramos-Munoz
Defendant:
Unknown Party
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Armstrong #314416 v. Ramos et al
as 2:2023cv02401
Plaintiff:
Kpou Armstrong
Defendant:
Alfred Ramos, Fransisco Hernandez and Mia Baldenegro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramos v. Elite Rooter Phoenix Incorporated et al
as 2:2023cv02531
Plaintiff:
Julio Ermes Hernandez Ramos
Defendant:
Elite Rooter Phoenix Incorporated, Pratik Patel and Unknown Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 206 Collect Unpaid Wages
Ramos v. Gutierrez
as 4:2023cv00527
Petitioner:
Luis Ramos
Respondent:
Mark Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramos v. McAdorey et al
as 4:2023cv00490
Petitioner:
Netzahualcoyotl G Ramos
Respondent:
John McAdorey and Kris Mayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ramos v. Penzone
as 2:2023cv01992
Plaintiff:
Erica Rosemarie Ramos
Defendant:
Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
