Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Ramos v. USADO NOT DOCKET. ALL DOCKETING OCCURS IN THE CRIMINAL CASE.
as 0:2010cv04548
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Gerardo Ramos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv02414
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 623 Job Discrimination (Age)
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv00355
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2008cv05872
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Aderman et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv00759
Plaintiff:
Thomas Aderman, Carlos Alias, Robert Bell and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Colon-Perez et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv00485
Plaintiff:
Gilberto Colon-Perez, Gilberto Colon-Perez, Maria E. Mojica-Mojica and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Nelson et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 0:2008cv00481
Plaintiff:
Russell Nelson, Russell Nelson, Russell Nelson and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc., Medtronic Puerto Rico, Inc. and others
Consol Plaintiff:
David Wood, David Wood, David Wood and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Ramos v. Mills et al
as 0:2008cv00571
Plaintiff:
Joel Matos Ramos and Joel Matos Ramos
Defendant:
Victor Mills, Victor Mills, Victor Mills and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
