Cases 1 - 7 of 7
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA v. RANBAXY INC. et al
as 1:2019cv10356
Defendant:
Ranbaxy U.S.A. Inc., Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited, Ranbaxy Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
UNITED FOOD AND COMMERCIAL WORKERS HEALTH AND WELFARE FUND OF NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Cesar Castillo, Inc. v. Ranbaxy Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv10357
Defendant:
Ranbaxy U.S.A. Inc., Ranbaxy Inc., RANBAXY LABORATORIES, LTD. and others
Plaintiff:
Cesar Castillo, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Meijer, Inc. et al v. Ranbaxy Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv12129
Plaintiff:
Meijer Distribution, Inc. and Meijer, Inc.
Defendant:
Ranbaxy U.S.A. Inc., Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited, Ranbaxy Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
MEIJER INC. et al v. RANBAXY, INC. et al
as 1:2017mc91266
Plaintiff:
MEIJER INC. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Inc., RANBAXY LABORATORIES, LTD., Ranbaxy U.S.A. Inc. and others
Respondent:
Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Endo Health Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
MEIJER, INC. et al v. RANBAXY, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv11066
Petitioner:
Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Respondent:
Ranbaxy Inc., RANBAXY LABORATORIES, LTD., Ranbaxy U.S.A. Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Prinston Pharmaceutical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Meijer, Inc., et al v. Ranbaxy Inc., et al
as 17-8008
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MEIJER DISTRIBUTION, INC. and MEIJER, INC.
Defendant:
RANBAXY U.S.A. INC. and RANBAXY LABORATORIES LTD.
Defendant - Petitioner:
RANBAXY INC. and SUN PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.
Meijer, Inc. et al v. Ranbaxy Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv11828
Plaintiff:
Meijer, Inc. and Meijer Distribution, Inc.
Defendant:
Ranbaxy Inc., Ranbaxy U.S.A. Inc., Sun Pharmaceuticals Industries Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
