Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Pineville Firefighters Local 1384 et al v. Pineville
as 1:2020cv01111
Plaintiff:
Mark Warren, Richerd Deen, Joshua Bordelon and others
Defendant:
City of Pineville
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402
Ureteknologia v. Uretek
as 20-20073
Plaintiff / Appellant:
URETEKNOLOGIA DE MEXICO S.A. DE C.V. and URELIFT S.A DE C.V
Defendant / Appellee:
BRENT J. BARRON and RANDALL BROWN
Cross Appellant:
URETEK (USA), INCORPORATED
Turley et al v. Janssen Research & Development, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv07570
Plaintiff:
Susan Turley , William Exline , Thomas Hensel and others
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC , Janssen Ortho LLC , Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Collier et al
as 6:2017cv00058
Plaintiff:
Randall Brown
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Carroll Monroe and Tawana Monroe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ureteknologia De Mexico S.A. De C.V. et al v. Uretek (USA), Inc. et al
as 4:2016cv02762
Defendant:
Uretek (USA), Inc, Uretek (USA), Inc., Brent J. Barron and others
Plaintiff:
Ureteknologia De Mexico S.A. De C.V, Ureteknologia De Mexico S.A. De C.V. and Urelift S.A de C.V
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Simon v. Ratliff et al
as 2:2012cv00251
Defendant:
Randall Brown, Great West Casualty Company , Richard L Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Donald Simon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Harris et al
as 1:2011cv00683
Plaintiff:
Randall Brown
Defendant:
Jared Harris, Christian Madsen, Pliant Ventures LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Wilson v. Great West Casualty Company et al
as 2:2011cv00978
Defendant:
Great West Casualty Company , Ronald Brown, Richard L Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Wilson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Quarterman
as 4:2009cv00460
Petitioner:
Randall Brown
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
