Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Robert Davis v. Attorney General Pennsylvania, et al
as 23-2401
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERT K. DAVIS
Defendant / Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and RANDALL SEARS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03006
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02231
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Tillery v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2016cv00235
Plaintiff:
Major George Tillery
Defendant:
John Wetzel, John Kerestes, Brenda Tritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Davis v. Randall Sears, et al
as 13-1544
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT K. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL SEARS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
Robert Davis v. Randall Sears, et al
as 13-1275
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT K. DAVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
RANDALL SEARS, DISTRICT ATTORNEY PHILADELPHIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL PENNSYLVANIA
PALADINO v. ABRAHAM et al
as 2:2009cv05041
Petitioner:
CHARLES T. PALADINO
Respondent:
LYNN ABRAHAM, HUGH BURNS, SHEA RHODES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
SEARS et al v. CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2009cv64672
Plaintiff:
RANDALL SEARS and GERALDINE SEARS
Defendant:
CROWN CORK & SEAL COMPANY, GARLOCK, INC, OWENS CORNING and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
SEARS v. A.C. & S INC. et al
as 2:2009cv64631
Plaintiff:
RANDALL SEARS and RANDALL SEARS
Defendant:
A.C. & S INC., ARMSTRONG WORLD INDURTRIES, INC., ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Bruce Ferrell v. Jeffrey Beard, et al
as 08-2102
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRUCE FERRELL
Defendant - Non-Participating:
JEFFREY BEARD, SUZANNE HUESTON, KORMANIC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
