Cases 1 - 10 of 52
April Davis v. WMATA
as 23-2300
Plaintiff:
APRIL A. DAVIS
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and RANDY CLARKE
WALLBUILDER PRESENTATIONS v. CLARKE
as 1:2023cv03695
Plaintiff:
WALLBUILDER PRESENTATIONS
Defendant:
RANDY CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Davis v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority et al
as 8:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
April Davis and April A. Davis
Defendant:
Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority and Randy Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
MABREY v. WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY et al
as 1:2023cv00569
Plaintiff:
THOMAS MABREY and THOMAS A. MABREY
Defendant:
WASHINGTON METROPOLITAN AREA TRANSIT AUTHORITY and RANDY CLARKE
Jacobs v. Clark
as 0:2021cv03008
Plaintiff:
Nathaniel Jacobs, Jr.
Defendant:
Randy Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Clarke v. Social Security
as 1:2019cv06114
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Randy Clarke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Cintron-Lugos et al v. Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11888
Plaintiff:
Trevor Davidson, Charles Cross, Elsie Clark and others
Defendant:
Kingdom Of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Abel et al v. Islamic Republic of Iran
as 1:2018cv11837
Plaintiff:
Leyda C Ayala, Elsie Clark, Shelly Ray Watford and others
Defendant:
The Islamic Republic of Iran and Islamic Republic of Iran
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 2333
Damon v. Moore et al
as 1:2018cv00380
Defendant:
John Doe Police Officers ##1-6, L. Edward Moore, Christopher M. Duntz and others
Plaintiff:
Tiffany Damon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Huddleston v. John Christner Trucking, LLC
as 4:2017cv00549
Plaintiff:
Thomas Huddleston, Ryan Cooper, James Murphy and others
Defendant:
John Christner Trucking, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
