Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Burley v. Waybourn et al
as 4:2023cv01197
Petitioner:
Rasheed Akeem Burley
Respondent:
Bill Waybourn and State of Texas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01192
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Rasheed v. Marchette et al
as 5:2023cv00129
Plaintiff:
Basil Abdul Rasheed
Defendant:
Jude Marchette, Mary Marchette and Jude Marchette, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Fehr et al v. Unicorn Freight LLC et al
as 3:2023cv00271
Plaintiff:
Debra Fehr and Theresa Riley
Defendant:
Unicorn Freight LLC, Diebel Transportation, LLC, Estate of Donald Diebel, Jr. and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Rasheed Wall, Akeem Hopkins and Joaquin Murrieta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Kennedy v. NHDC Colony, LLC
as 4:2023cv02167
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Kennedy
Defendant:
NHDC Colony, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00494
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Rasheed v. Miraj Communications, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00707
Defendant:
Ashraf Umar, Miraj Communications, LLC and Miraj Communications, LLC doing business as Metro PCS
Plaintiff:
Mohammed Rasheed
Davis v. JPSO Officials et al
as 3:2021cv00437
Plaintiff:
Rasheed Davis and Sheed
Defendant:
State of Louisiana, Med Fusion, JPSO Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021xc00334
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Akinsanya v. USA Do not docket in this case. File only in 4:17-cr-00119-2.
as 4:2020cv03523
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Rasheed Akinsanya
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
