Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jimenez v. Corizon Health Services et al
as 4:2016cv00708
Plaintiff:
Raul Jimenez
Defendant:
Corizon Health Services, Charles L Ryan, Arizona, State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sicre Yepiz Celaya y Asociados S.C. v. YouTube, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00392
Plaintiff:
Sicre Yepiz Celaya y Asociados S.C.
Defendant:
YouTube, Inc., YouTube, LLC, Raul Jimenez and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
USA v. Raul Jimenez
as 12-50014
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RAUL JIMENEZ
Mary Cotton, et al v. Anthony Martinez, et al
as 10-55975
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARY COTTON, individually and in her capacity as Successor-in-Interest for decedent Russell Dene Cotton, DEANA MCCAMMON, individually and SANDRA PARENT, individually
Plaintiff:
PATRICK COTTON
Defendant - Appellee:
ANTHONY MARTINEZ, DENNIS AVILA, TIMONTY MCWILLIAMS and others
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SANTA BARBARA, a public entity, JIM ANDERSON, Sheriff-Coroner, PATRICK R. TRUDGEON, Det., Coroner's Investigator and others
Mary Cotton, et al v. Santa Barbara Cnty, et al
as 2:2003cv07652
Defendant:
50 unknown other named defendants, American Medical Response, Jim Anderson and others
Unknown:
Attorney Settlement Officer Coordinator and Audrey B Collins
Plaintiff:
Mary Cotton, Mary Cotton, Patrick Cotton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jimenez-Rodriguez v. United States of America
as 2:2009cv00981
Petitioner:
Edgar Raul Jimenez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
USA v. Jose Jimenez-Lopez
as 09-50156
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE RAUL JIMENEZ-LOPEZ
Eric Paul Jimenez v. Doug Russell Hayes
as 2:2008cv06195
Plaintiff:
Eric Raul Jimenez
Defendant:
Doug Russell Hayes
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Forma Pauperis Denial
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
