Cases 11 - 20 of 238
Jose Pedroza et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv05012
Defendant:
Raul Lopez, Cecil Mangrum, CITY OF LOS ANGELES and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Pedroza
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Raul Lopez-Alvarez
as 20-55202
Defendant / Appellant:
RAUL LOPEZ-ALVAREZ
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Raul Lopez-Alvarez v. United States of America
as 2:2019cv03436
Petitioner:
Raul Lopez-Alvarez
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Raul Lopez Reyes v. Erik Bonnar, et al
as 19-15604
Not Yet Classified:
JEFFREY LYNCH, Field Office Director, Denver Field Office, United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement, RAUL LOPEZ REYES, ERIK BONNAR, Acting Field Office Director, San Francisco Field Office, United States Immigration & Customs Enforcement and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv07429
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Reginald Bunn, Jr. v. Raul Lopez
as 17-16232
Petitioner - Appellant:
REGINALD THOMAS BUNN, Jr.
Respondent - Appellee:
RAUL LOPEZ, Warden
Roberto Lopez-Gomez, et al v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 17-71197
Petitioner:
ROBERTO LOPEZ-GOMEZ, AKA Raul Lopez-Vieyra, AKA Felipe Miranda Ramos, AKA Felipe Rigoberto Ramos Miranda, DEYLIS YESENIA MORALES-VELASQUEZ and GELBER ARONI MORALES
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Raymond Peyton v. Edmund Brown, Jr., et al
as 17-55140
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND EUGENE PEYTON
Defendant - Appellee:
EDMUND G. BROWN, Jr., JEFFREY BEARD, BERNARD J. SCHWARTZ and others
Robert Bishop v. Raul Lopez, et al
as 16-17352
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT BISHOP
Defendant - Appellee:
RAUL LOPEZ, Warden, J. GERMOND, C. RODRIGUEZ and others
Rosa Meza et al v. Verdugo Woodlands LLC et al
as 2:2016cv04995
Defendant:
Gate Management LLC, Verdugo Woodlands LLC and Zeus Property Management, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Nina Lopez, Raul Lopez, Rosa Meza and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
