Cases 1 - 10 of 49
USA v. Ramos
as 23-50873
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Raul Ramos, also known as Alto, also known as Naranjo, also known as GQ, also known as Raulito, also known as Cochise
USA v. Ramos
as 23-50122
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Raul Ramos, also known as Alto, also known as Naranjo, also known as GQ, also known as Raulito, also known as Cochise
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv05119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Religion)
USA v. Ramos
as 23-50120
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Raul Ramos, also known as Alto, also known as Naranjo, also known as GQ, also known as Raulito, also known as Cochise
USA v. Ramos
as 22-50795
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Raul Ramos, also known as Alto, also known as Naranjo, also known as GQ, also known as Raulito, also known as Cochise
Ramos v. United States of America
as 5:2022cv00841
Plaintiff:
Raul Ramos
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
FILING ERROR
as 5:2022cv00380
Plaintiff:
Raul Ramos
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ramos Lebron II v. Walmart Stores East, LP
as 6:2020cv01451
Defendant:
Walmart, Inc., Walmart Stores East, LP and Wal-Mart Stores East, LP,
Plaintiff:
Raul Ramos Lebron II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. Ramos
as 21-51222
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Raul Ramos, also known as Alto, also known as Naranjo, also known as GQ, also known as Raulito, also known as Cochise
Schweitzer et al v. The Investment Committee of the Phillips 66 Savings Plan et al
as 4:2017cv03013
Plaintiff:
Raul Ramos, Jonathan Sapp, Jeffery Schweitzer and others
Defendant:
Sam Farace, John Does 1-10, inclusive and The Investment Committee of the Phillips 66 Savings Plan
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Zam Atiram
Consolidated Defendant:
Phillips 66 Company, Greg C. Garland, Paula A. Johnson and others
Counter Defendant:
Kevin Mitchell, Jesse A. Stephan, Alex J. Shabet and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
