Cases 1 - 10 of 12
(PC) Medina v. Johnson et al
as 2:2023cv00873
Plaintiff:
Ray Medina
Defendant:
RC Johnson, Z. Neblet, Maria Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Ray Medina v. R.C. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv04810
Plaintiff:
Ray Medina
Defendant:
R.C. Johnson, Z. Neblet, Maria Dominguez and others
Respondent:
J. Phelan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Medina v. Johnson et al
as 2:2022cv01163
Plaintiff:
Ray Medina
Defendant:
R.C. Johnson, Z. Neblet, Maria Dominguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brownridge v. City of New York et al
as 1:2021cv04603
Plaintiff:
Samuel Brownridge
Defendant:
City of New York and Detective Ray Medina
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MEDINA et al v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv01013
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC and OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANY LTD
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA MEDINA and RAY MEDINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
USA v. Daniel Medina
as 16-10286
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DANIEL RAY MEDINA
Ray Medina v. B. Morris, et al
as 13-55617
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAY MEDINA
Defendant - Appellee:
B. MORRIS, Facility Captain at RJD, D. K. MCBRIDE, Associate Warden of RJD, P. A. CORTEZ, Correctional Counselor at RJD and others
Medina v. Kelso et al
as 1:2012cv01685
Plaintiff:
Ray Medina
Defendant:
J. Clark Kelso, L. D. Zamora and D. Couto Da Silva
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ray Medina v. L. Emard, et al
as 10-17500
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAY MEDINA
Defendant - Appellee:
L. EMARD, ERICA BARAJAS, F B HAWS, Correctional Officer and others
Ray Medina v. L. Emard, et al
as 10-15483
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAY MEDINA
Defendant - Appellee:
L. EMARD, ERICA BARAJAS, F B HAWS, Correctional Officer and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
