Cases 31 - 40 of 134
Morris v. Electro Scientific Industries, Inc. et al
as 3:2018cv02064
Defendant:
Frederick A. Ball, Richard H. Wills, Raymond A. Link and others
Plaintiff:
Brian Morris
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2018cv00959
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12111 Americans With Disabilities Act
Rice et al v. Ambrocio et al
as 3:2018cv00875
Defendant:
Gina Linda Ambrocio, Carl G. Anderson, John William Anderson and others
Plaintiff:
Monika Gartner and Norman Alan Rice
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Brandon v. Laney
as 6:2018cv00432
Petitioner:
Raymond Lewis Brandon
Respondent:
Garrett Laney
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Oslund v. Kelly et al
as 6:2018cv00021
Respondent:
Brandon Kelly and Oregon Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision
Petitioner:
Jann Raymond Oslund
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Waters v. Savary et al
as 3:2017cv02042
Defendant:
Kelley Berber, Samuel Clande, Tyler Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Lee Waters
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Pacini v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2017cv01587
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Raymond L. Pacini
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Ingram v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv01334
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Raymond Darrell Ingram
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 g Review of Commissioner's Final Decision
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv01179
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv01036
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
