Cases 1 - 10 of 24
Wright v. Coveny
as 23-6808
Petitioner / Appellant:
GLASCO WRIGHT
Respondent / Appellee:
RAYMOND COVENY, as Superintendent of the Elmira Correctional Facility
Wright v. Coveny
as 1:2022cv08802
Petitioner:
Glasco Wright
Respondent:
Raymond Coveny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wright v. Coveny
as 6:2022cv06164
Petitioner:
Glasco Wright
Respondent:
Raymond Coveny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander v. Coveny et al
as 1:2021cv01006
Petitioner:
William Alexander
Respondent:
Superintendent Raymond Coveny, Honorable Letitia James and Letitia James
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hudson v. Coveny
as 20-4169
Petitioner / Appellant:
Martinous Hudson
Respondent / Appellee:
Raymond Coveny, Superintendent of Elmira Correctional Facility
Woods v. Annucci et al
as 9:2020cv00570
Defendant:
Jill Grant, John or Jane Does 11-15, Joseph Bellnier and others
Plaintiff:
Lee Woods
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hudson v. Coveny
as 9:2020cv00210
Petitioner:
Martinous Hudson
Respondent:
Anthony J. Annucci and Raymond Coveny
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Medina v. Buther
as 19-3348
Defendant:
Michelle Belgard, M.D., Gregg Esposito, Captain at Eastern Correctional Facility, Kevin Signore, Captain at Five Points Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Anthony Medina
Defendant / Appellant:
New York State Department of Correction and Community Supervision
Gregory v. Coveny
as 1:2019cv05432
Respondent:
Superintendent Raymond Coveny
Petitioner:
Paul Gregory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Tafari v. Fanelli
as 19-2589
Defendant / Appellee:
Jeffrey Minnerly, Paul Piccolo, James Carpenter and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
InJah Unique Tafari
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
