Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Birrell, et al., v. Fox, et al.,
as 2:2016cv01818
Plaintiff:
David Wesley Birrell , Raymond D. Jackson, Sr. , Sidney Ross Deegan, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Robert W. Fox, Joseph A. Bick, M. Cordero-Boucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Governor of the State of California, et al.
as 2:2015cv02665
Petitioner:
Raymond D. Jackson, Sr.
Respondent:
Governor of the State of California and Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Governor of the State of California et al
as 3:2015cv05227
Plaintiff:
Raymond D. Jackson, Sr.
Defendant:
Governor of the State of California and Edmund G. Brown, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Bick et al
as 2:2015cv02066
Plaintiff:
Raymond D. Jackson, Sr.
Defendant:
J. Bick, N. Aguilera, L. Crosson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Fox
as 2:2015cv00573
Petitioner:
Raymond D. Jackson, Sr.
Respondent:
Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jackson v. Singh et al
as 2:2014cv02809
Plaintiff:
Raymond D. Jackson, Sr.
Defendant:
Singh, Duffy, Kaplan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Raymond Jackson, Sr. v. M. Osman, et al
as 13-17520
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RAYMOND D. JACKSON, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
M. OSMAN, M.D., J. BICK, M.D. and AGUILERA
Raymond Jackson, Sr. v. K. Dickerson
as 11-16436
Petitioner - Appellant:
RAYMOND D. JACKSON, Sr.
Respondent - Appellee:
K. DICKERSON
Raymond Jackson, Sr. v. USDC-CASAC
as 11-71498
:
In re: RAYMOND D. JACKSON, Sr.
Petitioner:
RAYMOND D. JACKSON, Sr.
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
K. DICKERSON
Jackson v. Pletcher et al
as 2:2011cv01157
Plaintiff:
Raymond D. Jackson, Sr.
Defendant:
Steve Pletcher, The Regents of the University of California at San Francisco Medical Center, M. Osman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
