Cases 21 - 30 of 57
Bailey v. Forostiak et al
as 3:2011cv00577
Plaintiff:
Ari Bailey
Defendant:
Stephen Forostiak, Harley G. Lappin, Connelly and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bailey v. Lappin et al
as 3:2011cv00578
Plaintiff:
Ari Bailey
Defendant:
Harley G Lappin, Connelly, Delbert G. Sauers and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Saucedo-Gonzalez v. Holt et al
as 1:2010cv02472
Plaintiff:
Luis Saucedo-Gonzalez
Defendant:
Raymond E. Holt and Rufus Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
BAILEY et al v. LAPPIN et al
as 2:2010cv01834
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY, DAMION NELSON, JASPER DUCKERY and others
Defendant:
HARELY G. LAPPIN, AMERICAN CORRECTIONAL ASSOCIATION, CONNELLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jeremy Pinson v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 10-5059
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant - Appellee:
Harley G. Lappin, Joyce K. Conley, Raymond E. Holt and others
PINSON v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2010cv00092
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PINSON
Defendant:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, JOYCE K. CONLEY, RAYMOND E. HOLT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Bailey v. Lappin et al
as 5:2009cv00382
Plaintiff:
Ari Bailey
Defendant:
Harley Lappin, Raymond E. Holt, D.B. Drew and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv01439
Plaintiff:
ARI BAILEY
Defendant:
HARLEY LAPPIN, RAYMOND E. HOLT, D.B. DREW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BAILEY v. LAPPIN et al
as 1:2009cv01254
Petitioner:
ARI BAILEY
Respondent:
HARLEY G. LAPPIN, CONNELLY, DELBERT G. SAVERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Olivo v. Reece et al
as 2:2007cv02452
Plaintiff:
Augustine Olivo
Defendant:
Constance Reece, Charles L. Smith, Raymond E. Holt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
