Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Velazquez (PS) v. RE/MAX LLC et al
as 1:2026cv02961
Plaintiff:
Jerson Immer Velazquez
Defendant:
RE/MAX LLC and James Robert Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02807
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Velazquez Ordonez v. Cunningham et al
as 0:2026cv61691
Plaintiff:
Jerson Immer Velazquez Ordonez
Defendant:
James Robert Cunningham, Shawn Thomas Isenhour, Steven S. Margolis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Velazquez Ordonez v. Cunningham et al
as 1:2026cv04438
Plaintiff:
Jerson Immer Velazquez Ordonez
Defendant:
James Robert Cunningham, Shawn Thomas Isenhour, Steven S. Margolis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
VELAZQUEZ ORDONEZ v. SHAW-WILDER et al
as 1:2026cv01573
Plaintiff:
JERSON VELAZQUEZ ORDONEZ
Defendant:
DETRA SHAW-WILDER, CAROLYNA DELIZIA SWIFT, RACHAEL LOKOHEN and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
David Carpenter v. Mike Barton, et al
as 26-1977
Plaintiff:
DAVID CARPENTER
Defendant:
MIKE BARTON, RICHARD WALTER LONG, PAUL J. KILLION and others
RE/MAX LLC v. MMS Investment Group, LLC, et al
as 1:2026cv00963
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX LLC
Defendant:
Mike Sanchez and MMS Investment Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Roher v. RE/MAX, LLC
as 8:2026cv00311
Plaintiff:
Mitchell Roher
Defendant:
RE/MAX, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
RE/MAX, LLC et al v. DULIN
as 1:2025cv02589
Plaintiff:
RE/MAX, LLC and RE/MAX Integrated Regions, LLC
Defendant:
JAMES E. DULIN, II and The Hamilton Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Yu Hin Chan v. RE/MAX LLC, et al
as 25-14329
Plaintiff:
YU HIN CHAN
Defendant:
RE/MAX LLC, KEVIN C. MCCLANAHAN, KAREN MAY BACDAYAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
