Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv02119
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
v. Smith et al
as 2:2021at01077
Defendant:
Gilbert Earl Smith, Warden Matthew Atchley and People of the State of California Real Party in Interest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Smith v. Atchley et al
as 2:2021at01076
Petitioner:
Gilbert Earl Smith
Respondent:
Warden Matthew Atchley and People of the State of California Real Party in Interest
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Meniooh v. Two Jinn, Inc. et al
as 3:2021cv02840
Defendant:
MTA Mullen, Charles Eli Blasigame, Humboldt County and others
Plaintiff:
Ra-Tah Meniooh
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv08200
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Caridad Gadia et al v. National City Bank et al
as 2:2019cv03615
Defendant:
Does 1 through 100 Inclusive, Diplomat Property Manager LLC, National City Bank and others
Plaintiff:
Caridad Gadia and Caridad Gadia Corpus, Caridad real party in interest of the Name doing business as Caridad G Corpus doing business as Caridad Gadia Corpus
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0009
William Bird v. Real Party in Interest
as 2:2014cv07205
Plaintiff:
William Bird
Defendant:
Real Party in Interest
Rojas v. Fannie Mae, et al.
as 1:2011cv01226
Plaintiff:
Alejandro Rojas
Defendant:
Fannie Mae, United States Of America Real Party In Interest and Federal National Mortgage Association
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00671
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
