Cases 1 - 10 of 21
Redmond, Damario v. York, Ann et al
as 3:2020cv00553
Defendant:
C.O. Barzek, Lt. Mitchell, Lt. Stanic and others
Plaintiff:
Damario T Redmond
Not Classified By Court:
WCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmond, Rodney v. Warden et al
as 3:2020cv00289
Defendant:
Deputy Warden, Housing Unit 4 1st Shift Sgt., Housing Unit 4 Manager and others
Plaintiff:
Rodney James Redmond
Not Classified By Court:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmond v. Moungey et al
as 2:2018cv00098
Plaintiff:
Jamar Redmond
Defendant:
Andrew Moungey , Jacob Dorn, Lund and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmond v. Mason et al
as 1:2017cv00595
Plaintiff:
Jamar Redmond
Defendant:
CO Mason , Pac, Kapell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmond v. Moon et al
as 1:2016cv00404
Plaintiff:
Jamar Redmond
Defendant:
Tanya Moon , Lt Shane Waller and CO Edward
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmond, Rodney v. Syde
as 3:2015cv00672
Plaintiff:
Rodney James Redmond
Defendant:
Syde
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Redmond, Rodney v. Laurent, Dawn et al
as 3:2013cv00145
Plaintiff:
Rodney Redmond
Defendant:
Dawn Laurent , Nicholas Buhr , Dan Norge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Redmond v. Sirius International Insurance Corporation
as 2:2012cv00587
Plaintiff:
Ryan M Redmond
Defendant:
Sirius International Insurance Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ribble et al v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation et al
as 1:2012cv00378
Plaintiff:
Brendon F Ribble , Stuart Burgan , Joseph DiPalma and others
Defendant:
Kimberly-Clark Corporation , Kimberly-Clark Global Sales LLC and Kimberly-Clark Worldwide Inc
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
Redmond v. Cooper et al
as 1:2012cv00183
Plaintiff:
Rodney James Redmond
Defendant:
Sarah Cooper , Pete Erickson, Martha Breen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
