Cases 31 - 40 of 176
Reed v. Richmond City Justice Center
as 1:2022cv00488
Plaintiff:
Troy Lemont Reed
Defendant:
Richmond City Justice Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
VITIELLO et al v. Miyares et al
as 1:2022cv00450
Plaintiff:
RHIANNAN VITIELLO, CASSY NEWELL-REED, IRINA BARRETT and others
Defendant:
Jason S. Miyares, ALAN M. JONES, J.S. Walton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Declaratory Judgment
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Reed v. Smith et al
as 7:2022cv00169
Plaintiff:
Winston NaJee Reed
Defendant:
Lieutenant T. B. Smith and J. Carico
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. Clarke
as 3:2022cv00008
Petitioner:
Darnell K Reed
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Estate of John C. West, Jr. v. Thomas et al
as 1:2021cv01438
Plaintiff:
Estate of John C. West, Jr.
Defendant:
V. Thomas Thomas, Lankford & Reed, PLLC and Thomas Lankford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Reed v. Shamrock Foods Company
as 5:2021cv00067
Plaintiff:
William Reed
Defendant:
Shamrock Farms, LLC and Shamrock Foods Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodley v. Reed et al
as 3:2021cv00615
Plaintiff:
Carlos Alroy Woodley
Defendant:
Harold Reed, Holmes, Lt. Kevin Talley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Yoakam v. Virginia Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv00031
Defendant:
Virginia Department of Corrections, VDOC, Harold W. Clarke and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Yoakam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garces et al v. Gerber Products Co.
as 1:2021cv00902
Plaintiff:
Aileen Garces, Edelin Altuve, Jenny Anderson and others
Defendant:
Gerber Products Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
