Cases 31 - 40 of 316
Weaver v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2020cv00928
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Officer J. Smith, Officer R. Reese and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Weaver
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jenkins v. Woods et al
as 5:2020cv00495
Defendant:
Rhonda Stroup, FNU Smith, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
James Delonjan Jenkins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reese v. Salvador
as 3:2020cv01051
Plaintiff:
David Nathaniel Reese
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Tatiana R. Salvador
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Jackson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00734
Defendant:
Officer Petterson, Jonathan Jackson, Officer Reese and others
Plaintiff:
Dalvin Marquez Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melendy v. State of Florida et al
as 8:2020cv01879
Defendant:
Bruce Vincent, Lloyd Johansen, Robert Ashley and others
Plaintiff:
Mitchel Anthony Melendy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Riggins v. Riggins et al
as 3:2020cv00133
Defendant:
Thornton and Graham, P.C., Aretha Tammie Reese Riggins, Donna Elane Riggins and others
Plaintiff:
Daryl DeWayne Riggins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lynch v. Brasher et al
as 1:2020cv02690
Defendant:
Larry David Wolfe, Ashley L. Culberson, Michael D. Mann and others
Plaintiff:
Raoul Lynch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reese v. Quam et al
as 3:2020cv00464
Plaintiff:
David Nathaniel Reese
Defendant:
Bob Quam, Chad Poppell and Adrian Bishop
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Reese v Licandro
as 3:2020cv00251
Plaintiff:
David Nathaniel Reese
Defendant:
Joseph Rudolph Licandro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green et al v. Rakestraw et al
as 2:2020cv00142
Defendant:
Stephen Russell, Brant Gederian, Thomas S. Reese and others
Plaintiff:
Montrell D. Green, Amanda Grant and Reumekia Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
