Cases 31 - 40 of 55
Reese v. Mercedes-Benz Financial Servces, USA LLC
as 4:2014cv00023
Plaintiff:
Lorri D. Reese
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz Financial Servces, USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reese et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2013cv04874
Plaintiff:
Randy Reese and Rose Reese
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , Johnson & Johnson Inc and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lietzke v. County of Montgomery et al
as 3:2013cv04468
Plaintiff:
Bill Lietzke
Defendant:
County of Montgomery, Reese McKinney, D T Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas et al v. Texas Department of Family & Protective Services et al
as 4:2013cv00863
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Allen Thomas and Heather D. Shough
Defendant:
Texas Department of Family & Protective Services, Takisha Lusk Wilkerson, Crystal Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Reese v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2013cv00064
Plaintiff:
Kevin Joseph Reese
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 7:2013cv00058
Petitioner:
Kevin Joseph Reese
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lucky v. Haynes et al
as 3:2012cv02609
Plaintiff:
Bobby Dwayne Lucky
Defendant:
Sandra Haynes, NFN Nafrauri, K Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Janvey v Adams & Reese et,al
as 3:2012cv00495
Plaintiff:
Ralph S. Janvey
Defendant:
Adams & Reese, LLP, Breazeale, Sachse & Wilson, LLP, James R. Austin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 754
Reese v. Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2011cv02018
Petitioner:
Jonathan A Reese, Jr
Respondent:
Rick Thaler, Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reese v. Johnson
as 1:2011cv00092
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Dale Reese
Defendant:
R Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
